| Explanation & Hint:
A permissive free software license typically has fewer restrictions compared to copyleft licenses, allowing for more freedom in how the software can be used, modified, and distributed. From the options you’ve listed, the two that align with the nature of permissive licenses are:
- Means you can use the software for anything you want: Permissive licenses typically allow the software to be used for any purpose, including commercial and private uses, without significant restrictions imposed by the license itself.
- Places no restrictions on sharing modifications: Permissive licenses generally allow modifications to be shared without the requirement to also share the modifications under the same license. This means that modified software can potentially be distributed under a different or even proprietary license.
The other options do not accurately reflect the characteristics of permissive licenses:
- Requires you share software changes but not binaries: This description is more aligned with copyleft licenses, which often require that if you distribute modified software, you must also make the source code available under the same licensing terms.
- Does not allow the software to be locked to certain hardware: License terms specifically prohibiting or allowing hardware restrictions are not typically a focus of permissive licenses; rather, this issue might arise in the context of other types of licenses or software agreements.
- Places the software in the public domain: Placing software in the public domain is different from licensing it under a permissive license. Public domain involves relinquishing all copyright claims, making the work freely available to the public without any copyright restrictions, whereas permissive licenses still maintain copyright but with minimal restrictions on use and redistribution.
|